Ruibao News | Updated June 27, 2026

Beijing's Chaoyang district said a single-engine, two-seat light sport aircraft collided with a high-rise near the East Third Ring Road at 5:55 p.m. on June 26. The pilot, the only person on board, was killed, and 13 people at the scene were injured. The cause remains under investigation.

At 5:55 p.m. on June 26, a small aircraft struck a high-rise near Beijing's East Third Ring Road, according to a June 27 notice from Chaoyang district's official information platform. The notice said the aircraft was a single-engine, two-seat light sport aircraft, with only the pilot on board. The pilot died, and 13 people at the scene were injured and were being treated.

The Associated Press reported that a small aircraft had struck China Zun, the 528-meter tower formally called CITIC Tower. Flight-tracking service Flightradar24 identified the aircraft as a Sunward SA 60L Aurora and said it had taken off from an airport roughly 50 kilometers east of Beijing before the crash near the East Third Ring Road.

Videos and photographs of the scene circulated on platforms outside mainland China. The images showed apparent damage to the tower's glass facade and pieces of aircraft wreckage on the ground. AP said photographs appeared to show a hole in one side of the building; some social media footage could not be independently verified in full.

A social media image appears to show damage high on the facade of Beijing's CITIC Tower.
A social media image appears to show damage high on the facade of CITIC Tower. Authorities have not disclosed the exact point of impact or the full extent of damage to the building. Image source: social media.

The Chaoyang notice did not name the high-rise, identify the aircraft registration or give a cause. It said the case was still being investigated by the relevant authorities. Foreign media and flight-tracking data had earlier identified the aircraft as a Sunward SA 60L Aurora with the registration B-12PP.

B-12PP is a registration, not the model

The marking “B-12PP” visible on wreckage was quickly described online as the aircraft's model. Under aviation registration practice, it is more accurately the aircraft registration. Multiple reports identified the model as the Sunward SA 60L Aurora, a light sport aircraft developed by the aviation arm of China's Sunward group.

A social media image appears to show a wing fragment bearing the registration B-12PP.
A social media image appears to show a wing fragment bearing the registration “B-12PP” beside a road. Image source: social media.
A social media image appears to show a tail or fuselage section near CITIC Tower.
Another social media image appears to show a tail or fuselage section near a water feature outside the tower. Image source: social media.

The SA 60L Aurora is a single-engine, two-seat, low-wing light sport aircraft. Aircraft of this size are typically used for training, leisure flying and general aviation experiences. They are far smaller than commercial airliners, but wreckage and falling glass in a dense business district can still pose risks to pedestrians, traffic and building occupants.

Spain's El Pais, citing the Aviation Safety Network database, said the aircraft's departure and destination were both listed as Beijing Shifosi Airport. The airport lies to the northeast of the city and has been associated with flight training, private flying and aviation club activity. Flight plans, route approval and air traffic communications have not been disclosed by Chinese authorities.

The crash site is Beijing's CBD

CITIC Tower is Beijing's tallest building and stands in the Guomao area of the capital's central business district. The neighborhood contains financial firms, office towers, shopping complexes and the CCTV headquarters, and sits within a heavily controlled urban environment.

Commercial flights in Beijing generally operate through fixed airspace serving Beijing Capital International Airport and Beijing Daxing International Airport. General aviation aircraft, drones and low-altitude flights over the city are tightly restricted. AP reported that Beijing introduced new restrictions last month that effectively banned consumer drone sales and operation in the capital.

The aircraft's route from an outlying airport into the central business district will likely be one focus of any investigation. Investigators would need to examine not only mechanical failure or pilot action, but also whether the flight plan was approved, when controllers detected any deviation, when radar or radio contact changed, and how the ground response began.

Alarms inside the tower

A person who worked inside CITIC Tower told AP that fire alarms sounded after the aircraft hit the building and that occupants were later evacuated. The person spoke anonymously, citing concerns about possible repercussions.

Witnesses cited by several media outlets described a loud impact and debris falling to the street before police and firefighters arrived. Chaoyang district confirmed 13 injuries at the scene but did not disclose the identities of the injured, the severity of their injuries or where they were standing when they were hurt.

A social media image appears to show a large aircraft fragment on a sidewalk near parked electric scooters.
A social media image appears to show a large aircraft fragment on a sidewalk near parked electric scooters. Authorities have not released a full inventory of wreckage or ground damage. Image source: social media.

Police later sealed off roads around the site and told bystanders to stop filming and leave, according to media reports. Posts and videos about the crash were also reported to have disappeared quickly from mainland Chinese platforms, and searches on services such as Weibo and Douyin yielded little sustained public discussion.

Flight data will matter

The registration B-12PP is one starting point for investigators. It can lead to the aircraft's operator, maintenance records, pilot credentials and flight plan for the day; wreckage, flight track and radio communications will be needed to reconstruct the final minutes.

Public tracking data from services such as Flightradar24 can show only part of the picture. Beijing's civil and military radar records, air traffic control recordings, airport release records and ground surveillance footage would be needed to establish the full path from takeoff to impact.

If Beijing Shifosi Airport was indeed the departure and destination, the investigation would also touch general aviation oversight. Whether a training flight was allowed near the city center, whether the aircraft deviated from an approved route, and whether mechanical or navigation problems occurred will affect how the crash is classified.

Cause remains under investigation

By June 27, Chaoyang district had confirmed the pilot's death and 13 injuries at the scene. The notice did not explain why the aircraft entered airspace near the East Third Ring Road, or disclose the flight's purpose, flight plan, air traffic control records or maintenance history.

The area around CITIC Tower is dense with offices, high-rise buildings and traffic. If the aircraft came from an outlying general aviation airport, flight approval, airspace monitoring and high-rise emergency response are all likely to come under scrutiny.

Workers and residents near the tower are still waiting for more specific answers: why the aircraft was there, whether the building and surrounding streets are safe, how serious the 13 injuries are, and whether similar general aviation flights will be suspended.

Sources: This article draws on a June 27 notice from Chaoyang district's official information platform in Beijing, as well as reporting from the Associated Press, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, El Pais, People and flight-tracking information cited from Flightradar24. Officials have confirmed the pilot's death and 13 injuries at the scene, but the cause, flight plan and full investigation findings have not been released. References: Associated Press, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, El Pais, People.